Grassroots sporting stories from across the Somer Valley inspired by the Midsomer Norton and Radstock District Journal. Publishing local sports news until The Journal returns.
Friday, 7 August 2020
They think its all over...It is now!
New Balls Please!
Club Chairman, Bryn Jones, explained that the Coronavirus lockdown had many unexpected consequences, for the Club and its members.
“Our transition to Somer Valley Tennis has been an unexpected positive consequence of Covid 19. My committee, a brilliant hardworking team of volunteers and I have seized the moment and taken a major leap forward in creating a new platform to promote tennis across the Somer Valley.
Tennis has a golden opportunity to capitalise on the surge in interest in the sport because it can be played in a socially distance way and was one of the first sports to come out of the lockdown.
With excellent support from the LTA and the opportunity given to us because of Covid 19, the new Somer Valley Tennis platform will be able to facilitate tennis being played at a number of venues across the area, promoting the brilliant sport that people from all ages and abilities can play, at a standard that suits them.”
Competitive tennis also returned to the Avon area this week with the start of the “Lockdown League”, which includes a Somer Valley team. If you are interested in finding out more about Somer Valley Tennis Club, whether you are an experienced player or someone looking to pick up a racket for the first time, then visit https://clubspark.lta.org.uk/SomerValleyTennis for further information.
Wednesday, 5 August 2020
Paulton Rovers off to a flyer at Chipping Sodbury
Paulton started in the ascendancy with newcomers Cottle, Jackson, Llewellyn and Hailston all making good early impressions.
Cottle was linking things up well through the middle, Jackson had the beating of his full back, Llewellyn was winning 2nd balls and breaking things up in midfield and Hailston was providing a decent outlet up front.
With Withy and Gay looking fit and combining well down the right, and Dempsey was looking strong in the tackle at the back, Paulton controlled the first half and it was no surprise when Cottle opened the scoring after good interplay on the right enabled him to cut in and shoot left footed into the far corner from the edge of the box. Soon after a strong run down the right from Withy, who dug out a deep cross from the by line and Jackson finished well at the far post.
Will Hailston scored twice on his Paulton return |
Wholesale changes at half time for both teams disrupted the flow of the game, although it continued to be played in a very competitive spirit. Early on the Sodbury right back was replaced after being caught by a mistimed Ibrahim challenge that earned him a caution 5 mins into the half. Llewellyn was also an early victim of a clumsy mid-air challenge that meant a heavy fall, and was replaced by Seviour soon after. Full time at The Ridings, Chipping Sodbury 0 Paulton Rovers 4.
HELL AND HIGH WATER: GETTING NON LEAGUE FOOTBALL STRATED AGAIN
Radstock Town get Covid Ready |
Whilst optimism about fans return has been growing within the game in recent weeks, the news that pilot events at cricket, horse racing and snooker had been postponed on July 31st sent shockwaves across the non-league pyramid. A spike in Coronavirus cases has set the Governments unlocking timetable back by at least two weeks. In Blackburn with Darwen, social media reports indicated that Clubs have been told to stop contact training and not to play friendlies. Given the Prime Ministers statement on Friday, football at every level is facing the very real prospect that its return will be delayed, in spite of the FA’s announcement that its own Cup competitions are scheduled to kick off at the start of September.
Indeed, Friday’s announcement has also served to change the tone of footballs conservation within itself about what constitutes a safe return. The Football Association’s position is that: “A return to competitive football should only happen once clubs and facility providers have completed the necessary risk assessments and comprehensive plans are in place.” Inevitably, this has prompted much debate as to how the FA’s guidance should be interpreted. What is required as opposed to advised.
Whilst the Head of the National League System, Laurence Jones, made it clear in a letter sent to Western League Clubs on July 18th, that any pre-season fixture must be played behind closed doors, the door was left open for Somerset County League sides to play in front of “socially distanced” spectators. That door was closed on August 4th when Mr Jones issued a further letter extending the behind closed doors ban to the NLS Feeder Leagues, what the FA refer to as the “Grassroots” of the game.
The other loophole, concerning the legal status of football clubhouses has also been addressed by the FA. As a licenced premise, football clubhouses are subject to the same regulation as pubs and restaurants, but the FA have clarified that “there should be no entry to the ground for spectators” from such venues. The fact that the FA have been forced to issue such a statement after only one weekend of friendly matches, highlights a fundamental weakness with their own communication strategy.
The initial optimism was undoubtedly fuelled by the notion that whatever guidance had been put into place, football would largely be left to police itself when it came to monitoring Covid-19 compliance. Neither the Leagues or the County FA’s have the resources to ensure anything more than a Risk Assessment has been published, whilst guidance provided to Match Officials clearly states that “Referees are not responsible for clubs, players or spectators complying with The FA
Monday, 3 August 2020
Norton Waits for the Return of Rugby
The RFU, having submitted their Return to Community Rugby Action Plan to the Department of Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, hope to announce a move to Stage C "soon", which would allow larger group training and some close contact, yet a return to match play still remains some way off.
However, the Club has not stood still and volunteers have been working to create a new pitch at Norton Down, as well as replacing some of the old boilers in the changing rooms. When the Government give the green light for rugby to return, Norton will certainly be ready on and off the pitch. In the meantime, the clubhouse remains open on a Saturday, for members, between 2pm and 8pm.
Saturday, 25 July 2020
The Blame Game
For the Toolstation Western League, the 2020/21 season can begin from Saturday, September 5th, ahead of the Southern League, which is set to start on September 19th. The FA are urging Clubs, players, coaches, match officials, league officials, volunteers and fans to read their guidance, in addition to the latest Government guidance on COVID-19.
The FA press release, hailing the return of competitive football, made clear that: “A return to competitive football should only happen once clubs and facility providers have completed the necessary risk assessments and comprehensive plans are in place.” And in so doing the FA gave the clearest indication that making football Covid-19 compliant was going to be someone else’s problem.
Whilst their press release congratulated themselves on “working hard over recent weeks to prepare guidelines for the safe return of grassroots football”, they omitted to identify who would be responsible for ensuring this guidance would actually be met, leaving Clubs, players and officials in limbo as to whether the FA’s protocol was a suggestion or a requirement.
As licenced premises, football clubhouses are subject to the same regulation as pubs and restaurants, leaving local Councils with the responsibility to monitor their compliance and investigate complaints. Yet outside the clubhouse, who will be responsible for monitoring social distancing and test and trace? Leagues may be the first port of call, but will complaints made to them simply be passed on to County FA’s to investigate?
Football's greatest challenge to become Covid-19 compliant rests on the limited resources and expertise available at the base of the pyramid. Volunteers already hard stretched to manage a matchday now find themselves with the unenviable task of managing social distancing in the stands, bars, turnstiles and toilets. During play, players must regularly sanitise themselves and the ball, especially when it leaves the field of play.
Government guidance requests that players “avoid unnecessary breaking of social distancing such as pre-game handshakes, huddles, face-to-face confrontation with opponents and officials, and scoring celebrations.” Bad news if you are a star striker, good news for match officials, unless of course match officials are set to be given new powers to manage on field Covid-19 breaches?
If Club Officials were left scratching their heads about just how much work they’d need to do get their ground Covid-19 compliant, many were left fuming at the FA’s stipulation that pre-season fixtures must be played behind closed doors.
As football, at every step of the pyramid, rebuilds in the wake of Covid-19, communication from the Government and the FA must be crystal clear. Pre-season provides Clubs with an opportunity to claw back valuable revenue denied to them over recent months by the global pandemic. Whilst many fans will celebrate the safe return of football, the economics of the game, particularly at the base of the pyramid, rely on pints, pies and programmes.
Any measures limiting Clubs income, coupled with the increased costs of becoming Covid-19 compliant, not to mention the “impact on travel costs” for match officials, recognised in the FA’s own guidance document, could push Non-League Clubs past a financial tipping point that means they’d be better off not playing. It’s hard to believe that the FA haven’t recognised this fact but then again they didn’t consult the Step 5 and 6 Leagues on any of the provisions they were considering putting in place to restart football, provisions that apply from the Vanarama National League to the Toolstation Western League.
The FA’s failure to consult, coupled with the failure to clarify which measures are mandatory, is likely to lead to a two-tier approach to compliance, where those with the resources and inclination are likely to take a dim view on those perceived to be playing fast and loose. The football family, like the rest of society has had to come to terms with the greatest restriction of liberty any of us have ever known. For any of us to continue under that regimen we must have absolute clarity on what is required of us and ultimately what is to happen to those who won’t make the effort or the sacrifice for the greater good. Otherwise, what is the point?
Monday, 20 July 2020
Midsomer Norton Cricket looking for the Stars of Tomorrow
- Backpack
- Cricket
bat
- Cricket
ball
- Personalised
shirt with your child’s name
- Cap
Thursday, 16 July 2020
Footballs Staggered Start
We do know that the FA have submitted their action plan for getting football back underway, to the Department for Culture Media and Sport. Once approved, this will signify that football is “in compliance with COVID-19 Secure guidance”, a prerequisite for any organisation that wishes to operate outside of the general Coronavirus guidance.
The burning question occupying Club Officials, fans and players alike, is what concessions have the FA had to make to get us playing and watching again? Indeed, these negotiations have gone on behind closed doors, so to speak, with no consultation of the Leagues and more importantly the Clubs, who will be required to implement the guidance.
The FA made it clear at a Leagues meeting on June 19th that non-league football can only be played in front of fans, yet we don’t know how many fans that might be and there is growing speculation in the game that the FA’s insistence about playing in front of fans may not extend to pre-season. Indeed, the FA also talked about restarting the non-league pyramid at the same time, but there is growing speculation that the FA have reneged on that commitment, preferring instead to start the National League ahead of the Leagues below. The staggered restart may prove to be a sensible strategy, but if found to be correct, it calls into question all of the governing bodies other commitments to the grassroots game.
In terms of the detail, we know that wearing a face covering in shops and supermarkets will become mandatory from July 24th, but we don’t know whether this will extend to football grounds. We know that pubs and restaurants have been collecting contact details to support the test and trace programme, so we can only assume that Clubs, already following much of the advice required for the hospitality industry to re-open, will need to do the same. One way systems, hand sanitising stations and socially distanced queuing are all measures we’ve been coming to terms with in recent months, but unlike the supermarkets and petrol stations, the responsibility to implement and manage these restrictions will fall on the volunteers, not paid professionals.
How rigorously these restrictions will need to be implemented and whether there is any elasticity in the guidance between the top and the bottom of the pyramid, remains to be seen. Football is notoriously a game of the haves and the have nots and if we are to get back playing and watching again, the whole of the football family will need to come to terms with this new reality. As with pubs, some Clubs will be better at adhering to the guidance than others. Leagues lack both the inclination and resources to police Clubs efforts to become Covid compliant. So where will the final responsibility lie?
The FA’s own guidance to the Leagues has put the onus back onto the Clubs. Every Club at Steps 1 to 6 is responsible for producing their own Action Plan, which must be published on the Club’s website, whether they have one or not. So for any fan, player or official not happy with the arrangements they find at particular grounds, what should they do and will this be addressed in the FA’s guidance?
We really are in this together, so for anyone concerned about the suitability of a Clubs Covid compliance I’d suggest a friendly word in the ear of the Chairman is the right way to go. If we really want football to return we all going to have to work collectively to make sure that restrictions are applied and respected. I’m not advocating turning a blind eye to breaches of compliance, simply that our focus should be on constructive criticism. If Clubs can’t, or won’t, address the most important aspects of making their facilities Covid safe then I’d suggest its up to the County FA’s to step in, given that they have the personnel and punitive powers to bring Clubs into line.
The guidance published by the FA can’t only address how Clubs can open up to spectators or how players can safely use changing rooms, it needs to recognise that a shorted 2020/21 season will bring with it its own challenges. What if we experience a second wave, would we void another season? Would we take a pre-season played behind closed doors, if it meant grounds could open up to some, or all, spectators from September?
As the days pass, speculation grows about what footballs “new normal” will look like and who’ll get to watch it. The Coronavirus, much like the great British weather, won’t observe the niceties of the Leagues Committee’s meeting schedule, so we need to come up with an approach that is better, more responsive and much more representative of our football family and our beautiful game. Whether we get that detail by the end of this week remains to be seen, but there can be no doubt that a one size fits all approach won’t work for the non-league pyramid, whether the start is staggered or not.